Task 2

Rewrite using embedded relative clauses

Объедините предложения в одно, используя embedded relative clauses

  1. The proposal was controversial. The committee approved it. The committee was formed last year.
  2. The report was convincing. The expert reviewed the data. The data were submitted earlier.
  3. The policy was implemented nationwide. Experts supported it. They analysed the data.
  4. The theory remains disputed. Researchers proposed it. They conducted the experiment.
  5. The decision caused concern. The board made it. The board oversees the project.
  6. The evidence was ignored. The witnesses provided it. They were interviewed separately.
  7. The recommendation was rejected. The consultant made it. The consultant specialises in finance.
  8. The study was criticised. Scientists published it. They work in the field of genetics.
  9. The regulation was introduced quietly. Officials drafted it. They were appointed recently.
  10. The report was approved. The panel reviewed it. The panel was selected independently.
Answers

(possible variants)

  1. The proposal that the committee which was formed last year approved was controversial.
  2. The report that the expert who reviewed the submitted data found convincing was approved.
  3. The policy that experts who analysed the data supported was implemented nationwide.
  4. The theory that researchers who conducted the experiment proposed remains disputed.
  5. The decision that the board which oversees the project made caused concern.
  6. The evidence that the witnesses who were interviewed separately provided was ignored.
  7. The recommendation that the consultant who specialises in finance made was rejected.
  8. The study that scientists who work in genetics published was criticised.
  9. The regulation that officials who were appointed recently drafted was introduced quietly.
  10. The report that the panel which was selected independently reviewed was approved.