Task 2
Rewrite using embedded relative clauses
Объедините предложения в одно, используя embedded relative clauses
- The proposal was controversial. The committee approved it. The committee was formed last year.
- The report was convincing. The expert reviewed the data. The data were submitted earlier.
- The policy was implemented nationwide. Experts supported it. They analysed the data.
- The theory remains disputed. Researchers proposed it. They conducted the experiment.
- The decision caused concern. The board made it. The board oversees the project.
- The evidence was ignored. The witnesses provided it. They were interviewed separately.
- The recommendation was rejected. The consultant made it. The consultant specialises in finance.
- The study was criticised. Scientists published it. They work in the field of genetics.
- The regulation was introduced quietly. Officials drafted it. They were appointed recently.
- The report was approved. The panel reviewed it. The panel was selected independently.
Answers
(possible variants)
- The proposal that the committee which was formed last year approved was controversial.
- The report that the expert who reviewed the submitted data found convincing was approved.
- The policy that experts who analysed the data supported was implemented nationwide.
- The theory that researchers who conducted the experiment proposed remains disputed.
- The decision that the board which oversees the project made caused concern.
- The evidence that the witnesses who were interviewed separately provided was ignored.
- The recommendation that the consultant who specialises in finance made was rejected.
- The study that scientists who work in genetics published was criticised.
- The regulation that officials who were appointed recently drafted was introduced quietly.
- The report that the panel which was selected independently reviewed was approved.